STUDENT DISCIPLINE

I. Formal Due Process – Appropriate For Expulsions and Some Suspensions

1. Traditional Requirements of Formal Due Process:

a. Student must be notified in writing of specific charges against he/she.  The notice should set forth the procedures to be followed and the procedural rights available to the student.
b. Suspend student pending hearing if student poses danger or threat.
c. Notify appropriate individual, by registered or certified mail, of hearing and the right to be represented by counsel.

2. Recent Trend is to Provide Student Greater Access

a. Names of witnesses
b. Written reports/statements
c. School policies/procedures

3. Provide Student with List of Evidence Against Him, Including Names of Witnesses (Unless Fear of Reprisal Exists) and Evidence to be Presented

a. Colquitt v. Rich Twp. High School Dist. (Ill. App. Dist. I, 1998): Admission of hearsay testimony of student witnesses (written statements denied student procedural due process.  Right to cross-examine was imperative in case as outcome depended on witness credibility.
b. Colquitt indicates the additional scrutiny courts are utilizing in reviewing student discipline hearings.  If district is to rely on student statements, need to show; I) student unavailable; or ii) show significant safety risk.
c. School has no subpoena power to compel attendance of witnesses at hearing.