OFF-CAMPUS STUDENT DISCIPLINARY ISSUES

The recent Glenbrook North High School hazing cases challenged both the schools and the courts, amidst a storm or public controversy, to find a principled way to define the “nexus” required to authorize the discipline of students for off-campus misbehavior.  Below, we review how administrators can identify when a “nexus” exists, and how administrators can approach the more difficult questions relating to off-campus misconduct.

I. Is There a “Nexus” to the School?

a. Lander v. Seaver (1859) – the original “nexus” case.
b. Clements v. Board of Education of Decatur, Public School Dist. #61
c. Gendalman v. Glenbrook North High School – the new standard (2003).

II. Student Communication Over the Internet

a. Flaherty v. Keystone Oaks School District (2003) – the importance of good student handbook language.
b. J.S. v. Bethlehem Area School District (2002)
c. Other cases holding in favor of students.

III. Challenges to School Procedures

a. What process is due?

(i) suspension cases
(ii) expulsion cases

b. How specific must rules be?
c. Time limitations on “nexus” claims.